Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

THE EFFORT OF VARIOUS MIXING METHODS ON DYNAMIC VISCOELASTICITY OF A TEMPORARY SOFT LINING MATERIAL; COE-COMFORT

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 42±Ç 6È£ p.641 ~ 646
·ùÇöÁÖ, ½ÉÁؼº, ¹èÀº°æ, À̼®Çü, ¹®È«¼®, Á¤¹®±Ô,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
·ùÇöÁÖ ( Ryu Hyun-Ju ) - ¼Ò¼ÓÈ®ÀÎÁß
½ÉÁؼº ( Shim June-Sung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹èÀº°æ ( Bae Eun-Kyong ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
À̼®Çü ( Lee Seok-Hyeong ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÀÇ·á¿ø
¹®È«¼® ( Moon Hong-Suk ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÀÇ·á¿ø
Á¤¹®±Ô ( Jeong Mun-Gyu ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Statement of Problem. Temporary soft relining materials are used in a diverse clinical situations such as tissue conditioner, relining material, functional impression by varying its viscoelasticity. However, reproduction of consistent viscoelasticity has been not possible.

Materials and methods. Considering setting mechanism of this material, this study has measured the effect of varying amount of void in dynamic viscoelasticity of soft relining material, with three different mixing methods. In each methods 10 specimens were made and subjected to dynamic viscoelastic test which were measured at specific times over period of 72 hours.

Results. The analysis of the result shown that there was no statistically significant differences between different mixing methods.

Conclusion. Different mixing methods had no effect over control of viscoelasticity of soft lining material. Further research is recommended for under similar oral environmental condition.

Å°¿öµå

Soft tissue liner;Coe-Comfort;Viscoelasticity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed